{rfName}
Ma

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

This study was partially supported by the postdoctoral fellowship Beatriu de Pinos granted by the Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR), agency of the Secretariat of Universities and Research under the Department of Economy and Knowledge of the Catalan Government (Generalitat de Catalunya) and the Marie Curie-COFUND actions of the Seventh Framework Programme of Research and Technological Development of the European Union; as well as the Biomedical Research Networking Centres (CIBER) and the Consolidated research groups 2014 SGR 398; and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (PI12/0091) PN 2008-2011, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdireccion General de Evaluacion y fomento de la Investigacion; Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional. Union Europea, Una manera de hacer Europa. Dr Mur would like to thank the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for her research grant FIS-MSC Grant (PI11/01956). This research has been funded by Lundbeck.

Analysis of institutional authors

Reinares, MAuthorBonnin, CdmAuthorHidalgo-Mazzei, DAuthorVieta, ECorresponding Author
Share
Publications
>
Article

Making sense of DSM-5 mania with depressive features

Publicated to:Australian And New Zealand Journal Of Psychiatry. 49 (6): 540-549 - 2015-06-01 49(6), DOI: 10.1177/0004867415585583

Authors: Reinares, Maria; del Mar Bonnin, Caterina; Hidalgo-Mazzei, Diego; Undurraga, Juan; Mur, Maria; Nieto, Evaristo; Saez, Cristina; Vieta, Eduard

Affiliations

Univ Barcelona, Bipolar Disorders Program, Inst Neurosci, Hosp Clin Barcelona,IDIBAPS,CIBERSAM, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Desarrollo, Fac Med Clin Alemana, Dept Psychiat, Santiago, Chile - Author
Univ Lleida, IRBLleida Biomed Res Inst, Hosp Santa Maria, Psychiat Serv, Lleida, Spain - Author
Univ Psychiat Hosp, Inst Pere Mata, CIBERSAM, Reus, Spain - Author
Xarxa Assistencial Univ Manresa, Althaia, Manresa, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

The assessment of the depressive component during mania has become critical for the accurate diagnosis of mixed states, which were defined very narrowly in the past classification systems before Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). The aim of this study was to compare socio-demographic, clinical and therapeutic characteristics, as well as clinical and functional outcomes, between manic patients with and without mixed features to validate the relevance of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) mixed specifier.This is a subanalysis of a multicentre naturalistic study MANía Aguda y COnsumo de Recursos (acute mania and health resource consumption [MANACOR]) on the burden of mania in bipolar patients from four hospitals in Catalonia (Spain). The sample consisted of 169 adult patients presenting a manic episode and systematically assessed during a 6-month period.A total of 27% (n?=?46/169) of manic patients showed mixed features. Total number of episodes (p?=?0.027), particularly depressive and mixed, was greater in manic patients with mixed features, as well as depressive onset (p?=?0.018), suicide ideation (p?=?0.036), rapid cycling (p?=?0.035) and personality disorders (p?=?0.071). In contrast, a higher percentage of pure manic subjects were inpatients (p?=?0.035), started the illness with mania (p?=?0.018) and showed family history of bipolar disorder (p?=?0.037), congruent psychotic symptoms (p?=?0.001) and cannabis use (p?=?0.006). At baseline, pure manic patients received more risperidone (p?=?0.028), while mixed patients received more valproate (p?=?0.049) and antidepressants (p?=?0.005). No differences were found in syndromic recovery at the end of the study. However, depressive change was higher in the mixed group (p?=?0.010), while manic change was higher in the pure manic group (p?=?0.029). At the end of follow-up, the group with mixed features showed a significant trend towards higher psychosocial dysfunction.A total of 27% of manic patients showed mixed features. Groups differed regarding clinical characteristics, course of illness, psychosocial functioning, prescribed treatment and symptom progress. Depressive symptoms in mania should be routinely assessed and considered to guide treatment.© The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2015.

Keywords
bipolar disordercohortdepressive symptomsdisorderepisodeseuropean-maniainternational societymaniamixed featuresmixed statespolaritysymptomstask-force reportAdultBipolar disorderBipolar-longitudinal-evaluationDepressionDepressive symptomsDiagnostic and statistical manual of mental disordersEpisodesEuropean-maniaFemaleFunctional recoveryHumansI disorder patientsInternational societyMaleManiaMixed featuresMixed statesPsychiatric status rating scalesPure maniaRating-scaleSeverity of illness indexTask-force report

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Australian And New Zealand Journal Of Psychiatry due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2015, it was in position 23/139, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Psychiatry.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.59, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 5.07 (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-02, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 21
  • Scopus: 22
  • Europe PMC: 8
  • OpenCitations: 21
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-02:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 127.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 127 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 2.85.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 4 (Altmetric).
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Chile.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Reinares Gagneten, María) and Last Author (Vieta Pascual, Eduard).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Vieta Pascual, Eduard.