{rfName}
Fr

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Grant support

This study was financed by Pfizer USA by an unrestricted medical grant.

Analysis of institutional authors

Montejo Egido, LauraAuthor

Share

July 1, 2019
Publications
>
Article

Frequency of Sexual Dysfunction in Patients Treated with Desvenlafaxine: A Prospective Naturalistic Study

Publicated to:Journal Of Clinical Medicine. 8 (5): E719- - 2019-05-01 8(5), DOI: 10.3390/jcm8050719

Authors: Montejo, Angel L; Becker, Joemir; Bueno, Gloria; Fernandez-Ovejero, Raquel; Gallego, Maria T; Gonzalez, Nerea; Juanes, Adrian; Montejo, Laura; Perez-Urdaniz, Antonio; Prieto, Nieves; Villegas, Jose L

Affiliations

Hosp Univ Salamanca, Inst Invest Biomed Salamanca, Serv Psiquiatria, IBSAL, Salamanca 37007, Spain - Author
SACYL, Atenc Primaria Salamanca, Salamanca 37900, Spain - Author
Serv Navarro Salud, Osasunbidea 31008, Spain - Author
Univ Barcelona, Barcelona Bipolar & Depress Disorders Program, Inst Neurosci, IDIBAPS,CIBERSAM,Hosp Clin Barcelona, Catalonia 08401, Spain - Author
Univ Salamanca, Dept Estadist, Salamanca 37004, Spain - Author
Univ Salamanca, Dept Psiquiatria, Salamanca 37004, Spain - Author
Univ Salamanca, Nursing Sch EUFF, Salamanca 37004, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Despite being clinically underestimated, sexual dysfunction (SD) is one of the most frequent and lasting adverse effects associated with antidepressants. Desvenlafaxine is an antidepressant (AD) with noradrenergic and serotonergic action that can cause a lower SD than other serotonergic ADs although there are still few studies on this subject. Objective: To check the frequency of SD in two groups of depressive patients: one group was desvenlafaxine-naive; the other was made up of patients switched to desvenlafaxine from another AD due to iatrogenic sexual dysfunction. A naturalistic, multicenter, and prospective study of patients receiving desvenlafaxine (50-100 mg/day) was carried out on 72 patients who met the inclusion criteria (>18 years old and sexually active), who had received desvenlafaxine for the first time (n = 27) or had switched to desvenlafaxine due to SD with another AD (n = 45). Patients with previous SD, receiving either drugs or presenting a concomitant pathology that interfered with their sexual life and/or patients who abused alcohol and/or drugs were excluded. We used the validated Psychotropic-Related Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire (PRSexDQ-SALSEX) to measure AD-related sexual dysfunction and the Clinical Global Impression Scale for psychiatric disease (CGI-S) and for sexual dysfunction (CGI-SD) at two points in time: baseline and three months after the commencement of desvenlafaxine treatment. Results: In desvenlafaxine-naive patients, 59.2% of the sample showed moderate/severe sexual dysfunction at baseline, which was reduced to 44% at follow-up. The PSexDQ-SALSEX questionnaire total score showed a significant improvement in sexual desire and sexual arousal without changes in orgasmic function at follow-up (p < 0.01). In the group switched to desvenlafaxine, the frequency of moderate/severe SD at baseline (93.3%) was reduced to 75.6% at follow-up visit. Additionally, SD significantly improved in three out of four items of the SALSEX: low desire, delayed orgasm, and anorgasmia at follow-up (p < 0.01), but there was no significant improvement in arousal difficulties. The frequency of severe SD was reduced from 73% at baseline to 35% at follow-up. The CGI for psychiatric disease and for sexual dysfunction improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.01). There was a poor tolerability with risk of treatment noncompliance in 26.7% of patients with sexual dysfunction due to another AD, this significantly reduced to 11.1% in those who switched to desvenlafaxine (p = 0.004). Conclusion: Sexual dysfunction improved significantly in depressed patients who initiated treatment with desvenlafaxine and in those who switched from another AD to desvenlafaxine, despite this, desvenlafaxine treatment is not completely devoid of sexual adverse effects. This switching strategy could be highly relevant in clinical practice due to the significant improvement in moderate/severe and poorly tolerated SD, while maintaining the AD efficacy.

Keywords

antidepressantdesvenlafaxineprsexdq-salsex questionnairesexual dysfunctionswitching strategy20 mgAdultAgomelatine 25AnorgasmiaAntidepressantAntidepressantsArticleAssessment of humansClinical global impression scaleDepressionDesvenlafaxineDouble-blindDuloxetineEscitalopramFemaleFluoxetineHamilton depression rating scaleHumanLibido disorderMajor clinical studyMajor depressive disorderMaleMental diseaseMulticenter studyOrgasm disorderParoxetinePilot studyPlaceboPrevalenceProspective studyPrsexdq-salsexPrsexdq-salsex questionnairePsychotropic-related sexual dysfunction questionnaireScoring systemSertralineSexual dysfunctionSexual functionSsriSwitching strategyTreatmentVenlafaxine

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Journal Of Clinical Medicine due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2019, it was in position 36/165, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Medicine, General & Internal.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 2.29, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Sep 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-09-05, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 8
  • Scopus: 9
  • Europe PMC: 2

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-09-05:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 44.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 44 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.25.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 2 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Montejo, Laura.