{rfName}
Co

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

We thank all the authors of the included studies, especially those who kindly shared their data for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Funding for this study was provided by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) (PI16/00889, PI16/00144 and PI14/00292), FEDER funds/European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) -a way to build Europe-, a PERIS award from the Ministry of Health of the Gerteralitat de Catalunya (SLT006/17/249), and AGAUR (2017 SGR 1247). CIBERSAM is an initiative of the Carlos III Health Institute. MP-P and MA -N are supported by a FI Grant from AGAUR-Generalitat de Catalunya (2015 FI_B 00839 and 2017 FI_B 00327, respectively), grants co-ftmded by the European Social Fund (ESF) ESF, Investing in your future. JR and CS -M are supported by a 'Miguel Servet' contract from the ISCIII (CP14/00041 and CPII16/00048, respectively). AA-E is supported by a PFIS Predoctoral Contract (FI16/00311). BV is supported by a KU Leuven start-up grant STG/17/035. BJH is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Clinical Career Development Award (1124472).

Analysis of institutional authors

Fullana Llinàs, María NeusAuthorRadua, JAuthorAlbajes-Eizagirre, AAuthorFullana, MaCorresponding Author

Share

June 13, 2020
Publications
>
Review
No

Common and distinct neural correlates of fear extinction and cognitive reappraisal: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies

Publicated to:Neuroscience And Biobehavioral Reviews. 104 102-115 - 2019-09-01 104(), DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.029

Authors: Pico-Perez, M; Alemany-Navarro, M; Dunsmoor, J E; Radua, J; Albajes-Eizagirre, A; Vervliet, B; Cardoner, N; Benet, O; Harrison, B J; Soriano-Mas, C; Fullana, M A

Affiliations

Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Bellvitge Univ Hosp, Bellvitge Biomed Res Inst IDIBELL, Dept Psychiat, Feixa Llarga S-N, Barcelona 08907, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Neurosci, Rosello 140, Barcelona 08036, Spain - Author
ICVS 3Bs PT Govt Associate Lab, Braga, Portugal - Author
Inst Invest Biomed August Pi i Sunyer IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Ctr Psychiat Res & Educ, Stockholm, Sweden - Author
Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Psychosis Studies, London, England - Author
Melbourne Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia - Author
Mental Hlth Res Networking Ctr CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Neuroscience. Neuroscience Program. Psychiatry and Mental Health - Author
Parc Tauli Univ Hosp, Adult Mental Hlth Unit, Sabadell, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Psychiat & Forens Med, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Psychobiol & Methodol Hlth Sci, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Barcelona, Sch Med, Dept Clin Sci, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ KU Leuven, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Res Unit Brain & Cognit, Lab Biol Psychol, Leuven, Belgium - Author
Univ Melbourne, Dept Psychiat, Melbourne Neuropsychiat Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia - Author
Univ Minho, Sch Med, Life & Hlth Sci Res Inst ICVS, Braga, Portugal - Author
Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA - Author
See more

Abstract

Cognitive reappraisal and fear extinction learning represent two different approaches to emotion regulation. While their respective neural correlates have been widely studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), few direct comparisons between these processes have been conducted. We conducted a meta-analysis of fMRI studies of reappraisal and fear extinction, with the aim of examining both commonalities and differences in their neural correlates. We also conducted independent analyses that focused on specific reappraisal strategies (reinterpretation, distancing). Overall, we observed that the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and the bilateral anterior insular cortex (AIC) were similarly consistently engaged by reappraisal and extinction. Extinction was more consistently linked to activation of sensory and emotion processing regions, whereas reappraisal was more consistently associated with activation of a dorsal fronto-parietal network. Interestingly, the amygdala was preferentially deactivated by distancing. These results suggest that the dACC and the AIC are involved in domain-general regulatory networks. Differences between extinction and reappraisal could be explained by their relative processing demands on visual perceptual versus higher cognitive neural systems.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords

anterior insulabrain activationcognitive reappraisalconditioned feardistancingdown-regulationexpressive suppressionfear extinctionfmrifocused emotion regulationindividual-differencesmeta-analysisnegative emotionobsessive-compulsive disorderreinterpretationAmygdalaBrain mappingCerebral cortexCognitive reappraisalControlled studyDistancingDorsal anterior cingulate cortexEmotion regulationEmotional regulationEmotionalityExtinction, psychologicalFearFear extinctionFmriFunctional magnetic resonance imagingHumanHuman experimentHumansInsulaMagnetic resonance imagingMeta analysisMeta-analysisNerve netReinterpretationReviewVentromedial prefrontal cortex

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Neuroscience And Biobehavioral Reviews due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2019, it was in position 3/53, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Behavioral Sciences. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 3.96. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 3.1 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-09-12, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 72
  • Scopus: 66
  • Europe PMC: 56

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-09-12:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 148.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 148 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 4 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Australia; Belgium; Portugal; Sweden; United Kingdom; United States of America.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (Fullana Rivas, Miquel Àngel).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Fullana Rivas, Miquel Àngel.