{rfName}
De

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Panes, JAuthorOrdas, IAuthorRimola, JAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Development of the Lemann Index to Assess Digestive Tract Damage in Patients With Crohn's Disease

Publicated to:Gastroenterology. 148 (1): 52-63 - 2015-01-01 148(1), DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.015

Authors: Pariente, Benjamin; Mary, Jean-Yves; Danese, Silvio; Chowers, Yehuda; De Cruz, Peter; D'Haens, Geert; Loftus, Edward V., Jr.; Louis, Edouard; Panes, Julian; Schoelmerich, Juergen; Schreiber, Stefan; Vecchi, Maurizio; Branche, Julien; Bruining, David; Fiorino, Gionata; Herzog, Matthias; Kamm, Michael A.; Klein, Amir; Lewin, Maite; Meunier, Paul; Ordas, Ingrid; Strauch, Ulrike; Tontini, Gian-Eugenio; Zagdanski, Anne-Marie; Bonifacio, Cristiana; Rimola, Jordi; Nachury, Maria; Leroy, Christophe; Sandborn, William; Colombel, Jean-Frederic; Cosnes, Jacques;

Affiliations

CDI Hosp Clin, Dept Radiol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hop St Antoine, Dept Gastroenterol & Nutr, F-75571 Paris 12, France - Author
Hop St Antoine, Dept Hepatogastroenterol, F-75571 Paris 12, France - Author
Hop St Antoine, Dept Radiol, F-75571 Paris, France - Author
Hop St Louis, Dept Radiol, Paris, France - Author
Hop St Louis, INSERM, Biostat & Clin Epidemiol U717, Paris, France - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Dept Gastroenterol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Gastroenterol, New York, NY 10029 USA - Author
Imelda GI Clin Res Ctr, Bonheiden, Belgium - Author
IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Gastroenterol & Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Milan, Italy - Author
Ist Clin Humanitas, Dept Gastroenterol, BD Ctr, Milan, Italy - Author
Ist Clin Humanitas, Dept Radiol, Milan, Italy - Author
Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rochester, MN USA - Author
Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Gastroenterol, Haifa, Bat Galim, Israel - Author
St Vincents Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia - Author
UC San Diego Hlth Syst, Div Gastroenterol, La Jolla, CA USA - Author
Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands - Author
Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Lille, France - Author
Univ Kiel, Inst Clin Mol Biol, Kiel, Germany - Author
Univ Liege, Ctr Hosp Univ Liege, Dept Hepatogastroenterol, Liege, Belgium - Author
Univ Liege, Ctr Hosp Univ Liege, Dept Med Imaging, Liege, Belgium - Author
Univ Lille, Dept Hepatogastroenterol, Hop Claude Huriez, Lille, France - Author
Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England - Author
Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia - Author
Univ Milan, Milan, Italy - Author
Univ Regensburg, Dept Internal Med 1, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany - Author
See more

Abstract

There is a need for a scoring system that provides a comprehensive assessment of structural bowel damage, including stricturing lesions, penetrating lesions, and surgical resection, for measuring disease progression. We developed the Lémann Index and assessed its ability to measure cumulative structural bowel damage in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).We performed a prospective, multicenter, international, cross-sectional study of patients with CD evaluated at 24 centers in 15 countries. Inclusions were stratified based on CD location and duration. All patients underwent clinical examination and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging analyses. Upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging analyses were performed according to suspected disease locations. The digestive tract was divided into 4 organs and subsequently into segments. For each segment, investigators collected information on previous operations, predefined strictures, and/or penetrating lesions of maximal severity (grades 1-3), and then provided damage evaluations ranging from 0.0 (no lesion) to 10.0 (complete resection). Overall level of organ damage was calculated from the average of segmental damage. Investigators provided a global damage evaluation (from 0.0 to 10.0) using calculated organ damage evaluations. Predicted organ indexes and Lémann Index were constructed using a multiple linear mixed model, showing the best fit with investigator organ and global damage evaluations, respectively. An internal cross-validation was performed using bootstrap methods.Data from 138 patients (24, 115, 92, and 59 with upper tract, small bowel, colon/rectum, and anus CD location, respectively) were analyzed. According to validation, the unbiased correlation coefficients between predicted indexes and investigator damage evaluations were 0.85, 0.98, 0.90, 0.82 for upper tract, small bowel, colon/rectum, anus, respectively, and 0.84 overall.In a cross-sectional study, we assessed the ability of the Lémann Index to measure cumulative structural bowel damage in patients with CD. Provided further successful validation and good sensitivity to change, the index should be used to evaluate progression of CD and efficacy of treatment.Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords
behaviorillness index severitymriprognosisresponse to therapyvalidationAdultAustraliaColonoscopyCrohn diseaseCross-sectional studiesDiagnostic imagingEndoscopic indexEuropeFemaleGastrointestinal tractHumansIllness index severityIsraelLinear modelsMagnetic resonance imagingMaleMiddle agedMriMultimodal imagingObserver variationPredictive value of testsPrognosisProspective studiesReproducibility of resultsResponse to therapySeverity of illness indexTomography, x-ray computed

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Gastroenterology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2015, it was in position 1/79, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 5.73. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 9.06 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 60.21 (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-13, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 204
  • Scopus: 278
  • Europe PMC: 142
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-13:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 219.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 219 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 35.35.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 6 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Australia; Belgium; France; Germany; Israel; Italy; Netherlands; philadelphia; United Kingdom; United States of America.