{rfName}
Ce

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Benítez-Quintanilla LCorresponding AuthorPauta MAuthorMadrigal IAuthorBorrell AAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Cell-Free DNA Testing: What Is the Reason Why High-Risk Women Choose It?

Publicated to:Fetal Diagnosis And Therapy. 48 (1): 9-14 - 2021-01-01 48(1), DOI: 10.1159/000509796

Authors: Benítez-Quintanilla, L; Matas, I; Borrell, A; Pauta, M; Madrigal, I

Affiliations

Hospital Clinic Barcelona - Author
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer - IDIBAPS - Author
‎ BCNatal Fetal Med Res Ctr, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain - Author
‎ Hosp Clin Barcelona, CDB, Serv Bioquim & Genet Mol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
‎ Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, BCNatal, Sabino Arana St,1, ES-08028 Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

The aim of the study wasto describe the past medical history, sociodemographic, and pregnancy characteristics of women at high risk for aneuploidy and to determine which factors are related to her choice of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing instead of invasive diagnostic testing.We conducted a prospective descriptive study including pregnant women from the Western Barcelona public health area at high risk for fetal aneuploidy, defined as a trisomy 21 or 18 risk between 1/10 and 1/250 at the combined first-trimester or at the second-trimester biochemical screening. During 1 year (December 2018 to November 2019), these women were asked to fill in a confidential questionnaire about her past medical history, demographic and pregnancy characteristics, and her opinion about termination of the pregnancy after a counseling consultation with a maternal-fetal medicine specialist in which advantages and disadvantages of both testing methods, cfDNA or diagnostic testing, were discussed. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which factors were related with cfDNA uptake.During the study period, 82 pregnant women filled the questionnaire. The median maternal age was 39.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 37.3-40.9 years), and 73 (89%) of them were 35 years or older. Forty-three (52%) women opted for cfDNA testing, while 39 (48%) chose invasive diagnosis. In a logistic regression analysis, the use of assisted reproductive techniques (OR 13.03; 95% CI: 1.47-115.56; p = 0.021) and Latin American origin (OR 6.66; 95% CI 1.73-25.66; p = 0.006) were shown to be related to a higher cfDNA uptake. In contrast, nonreligious women (OR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.06-0.72; p = 0.013) and a favorable opinion about termination of pregnancy (OR 0.23; 95% CI: 0.06-0.92; p = 0.037) were related with a lower uptake.Half of the pregnant women at high risk for fetal aneuploidy opted for cfDNA testing. The main reason to choose cfDNA was avoiding the risk of pregnancy loss. Women using assisted reproductive techniques and those of Latin American origin preferred cfDNA testing, while nonreligious women and those with a favorable opinion on termination pregnancy preferred invasive testing.© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Keywords
Cell-free dnaFirst-trimester screeningInvasive diagnosis

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Fetal Diagnosis And Therapy due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-05-15:

  • WoS: 1
  • Scopus: 1
  • OpenCitations: 1
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-15:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 16 (PlumX).
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Benitez Quintanilla, Leticia) and Last Author (Borrell Vilaseca, Antoni).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Benitez Quintanilla, Leticia.