{rfName}
GM

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Cuervo AAuthorCelis RAuthorRamírez JAuthorSastre SAuthorCanete JdCorresponding Author

Share

March 15, 2021
Publications
>
Article

GM-CSF Expression and Macrophage Polarization in Joints of Undifferentiated Arthritis Patients Evolving to Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis

Publicated to:Frontiers In Immunology. 11 (613975): 613975- - 2021-02-17 11(613975), DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.613975

Authors: Fuentelsaz-Romero, S; Estrada-Capetillo, L; García-Campos, R; Puig-Kröger, A; Cuervo, A; Celis, R; Ramírez, J; Cañete, JD; Sastre, S; Samaniego, R

Affiliations

Hospital Clinic Barcelona - Author
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón - Author
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez - Author
‎ Hosp Clin Barcelona, Serv Cirugia Ortoped & Traumatol, Secc Artroscopia, Barcelona, Spain - Author
‎ Hosp Clin Barcelona, Serv Reumatol, Unidad Artritis, Barcelona, Spain - Author
‎ Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Marano, Inst Invest Sanitaria Gregorio Maranon IiSGM, Unidad Inmunometab & Inflamac, Madrid, Spain - Author
‎ Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Inst Invest Sanitaria Gregorio Maranon IiSGM, Unidad Microscopia Confocal, Madrid, Spain - Author
‎ IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain - Author
‎ Univ Autonoma Ciudad Juarez, Inst Ciencias Biomed, Lab Farmacol & Inflamac, Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico - Author
See more

Abstract

© Copyright © 2021 Fuentelsaz-Romero, Cuervo, Estrada-Capetillo, Celis, García-Campos, Ramírez, Sastre, Samaniego, Puig-Kröger and Cañete. Background and Aims: GM-CSF-dependent macrophage polarization has been demonstrated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to seek diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers for undifferentiated arthritis (UA) by analyzing GM-CSF expression and source, macrophage polarization and density in joints of patients with UA evolving to RA or PsA compared with established RA or PsA, respectively. Methods: Synovial tissue (ST) from patients with UA evolving to RA (UA>RA, n=8), PsA (UA>PsA, n=9), persistent UA (UA, n=16), established RA (n=12) and PsA (n=10), and healthy controls (n=6), were analyzed. Cell source and quantitative expression of GM-CSF and proteins associated with pro-inflammatory (GM-CSF-driven) and anti-inflammatory (M-CSF-driven) macrophage polarization (activin A, TNFα, MMP12, and CD209, respectively) were assessed in ST CD163+ macrophages by multicolor immunofluorescence. GM-CSF and activin A levels were also quantified in paired synovial fluid samples. CD163+ macrophage density was determined in all groups by immunofluorescence. Results: Synovial stromal cells (FAP+ CD90+ fibroblast, CD90+ endothelial cells) and CD163+ sublining macrophages were the sources of GM-CSF. ST CD163+ macrophages from all groups expressed pro-inflammatory polarization markers (activin A, TNFα, and MMP12). Expression of the M-CSF-dependent anti-inflammatory marker CD209 identified two macrophage subsets (CD163+ CD209high and CD163+ CD209low/-). CD209+ macrophages were more abundant in ST from healthy controls and PsA patients, although both macrophage subtypes showed similar levels of pro-inflammatory markers in all groups. In paired synovial fluid samples, activin A was detected in all patients, with higher levels in UA>RA and RA, while GM-CSF was infrequently detected. ST CD163+ macrophage density was comparable between UA>RA and UA>PsA patients, but significantly higher than in persistent UA. Conclusions: GM-CSF is highly expressed by sublining CD90+ FAP+ synovial fibroblasts, CD90+ activated endothelium and CD163+ macrophages in different types of arthritis. The polarization state of ST macrophages was similar in all UA and established arthritis groups, with a predominance of pro-inflammatory GM-CSF-associated markers. CD163+ macrophage density was significantly higher in the UA phases of RA and PsA compared with persistent UA. Taken together, our findings support the idea that GM-CSF is a strong driver of macrophage polarization and a potential therapeutic target not only in RA but also in PsA and all types of UA.

Keywords

gm-csfmacrophagespsoriatic arthritisrheumatoid arthritissynovial tissueundifferentiated arthritisActivin aActivinsAdultAgedAntigens, cdAntigens, differentiation, myelomonocyticArthritis, psoriaticArthritis, rheumatoidBiomarkersCd163 antigenCell adhesion moleculesCells, culturedCsf1 protein, humanDc-specific icam-3 grabbing nonintegrinFemaleFlow cytometryGene expression regulationGm-csfGranulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factorHumansImmunohistochemistryInhibin beta a subunitInhibin-beta subunitsLectins, c-typeMacrophage activationMacrophage colony-stimulating factorMacrophagesMaleMatrix metalloproteinase 12Middle agedMmp12 protein, humanPsoriatic arthritisReceptors, cell surfaceRheumatoid arthritisStromal cellsSynovial fluidSynovial membraneSynovial tissueTumor necrosis factor-alphaUndifferentiated arthritis

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Frontiers In Immunology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position 35/162, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Immunology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.58. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 1.44 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 9.23 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-22, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 31
  • Scopus: 31
  • Europe PMC: 20

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-22:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 44.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 45 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 3.1.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 6 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Mexico.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (Cañete Crespillo, Juan de Dios).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Cañete Crespillo, Juan de Dios.