{rfName}

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Grant support

This work was supported by the CB16/12/00400 (CIBERONC) and PI20-01346 grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Madrid, Spain) and FONDOS FEDER; the 0639-IDIAL-NET-3-3 grant (INTERREG POCTEP Spain-Portugal) from Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, and by the EuroFlow Foundation (Leiden, The Netherlands). N.M.-G. was supported by a pre-doctoral grant (Ref. IBPredoc17/00012) from IBSAL (Salamanca, Spain). M.L., N.V., J.J.M.v.D., A.O. and J.A. are members of the EuroFlow Consortium, www.euroflow.org (accessed on 16 December 2021).

Analysis of institutional authors

Villamor NAuthor

Share

January 24, 2022
Publications
>
Article

High-Sensitive TRBC1-Based Flow Cytometric Assessment of T-Cell Clonality in Tαβ-Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia

Publicated to:Cancers. 14 (2): 408- - 2022-01-01 14(2), DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020408

Authors: Munoz-Garcia, N; Moran-Plata, FJ; Barrena, S; Mateos, S; Caldas, C; van Dongen, JJM; Orfao, A; Almeida, J; Villamor, N; Lima, M

Affiliations

Ctr Hosp Porto, Hosp Santo Antonio, Dept Hematol, Lab Cytometry, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal - Author
IDIBAPS, Hosp Clin, Dept Pathol, Hematopathol Unit, Barcelona 08036, Spain - Author
Inst Biomed Res Salamanca IBSAL, Salamanca 37007, Spain - Author
Inst Salud Carlos III, Biomed Res Networking Ctr Consortium Oncol CIBERO, Madrid 28029, Spain - Author
Leiden Univ Med Ctr LUMC, Dept Immunol, NL-2333 Leiden, Netherlands - Author
Univ Porto, Abel Salazar Inst Biomed Sci ICBAS, Unit Multidisciplinary Res Biomed UMIB, P-4050313 Porto, Portugal - Author
Univ Salamanca USAL, IBMCC CSIC Univ Salamanca, Cytometry Serv, NUCLEUS,Dept Med, Salamanca 37007, Spain - Author
Univ Salamanca USAL, Translat & Clin Res Program, Ctr Invest Canc, Salamanca 37007, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Flow cytometric (FCM) analysis of the constant region 1 of the T-cell receptor ? chain (TRBC1) expression for assessing T??-cell clonality has been recently validated. However, its utility for the diagnosis of clonality of T-large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL) needs to be confirmed, since more mature T?? cells (i.e., T-LGL normal-counterpart) show broader TRBC1+/TRBC1- ratios vs. total T?? cells. We compared the distribution and absolute counts of TRBC1+ and TRBC1- T??-LGL in blood containing polyclonal (n = 25) vs. clonal (n = 29) LGL. Overall, polyclonal TRBC1+ or TRBC1- T??-LGL ranged between 0.36 and 571 cells/?L (3.2-91% TRBC1+ cells), whereas the clonal LGL cases showed between 51 and 11,678 cells/?L (<0.9% or >96% TRBC1+ cells). Among the distinct TCRV? families, the CD28- effector-memory and terminal-effector polyclonal T?? cells ranged between 0 and 25 TRBC1+ or TRBC1- cells/?L and between 0 and 100% TRBC1+ cells, while clonal LGL ranged between 32 and 5515 TRBC1+ or TRBC1- cells/?L, representing <1.6% or >98% TRBC1+ cells. Our data support the utility of the TRBC1-FCM assay for detecting T-cell clonality in expansions of T??-LGL suspected of T-LGLL based on altered percentages of TRBC1+ T?? cells. However, in the absence of lymphocytosis or in the case of T??CD4-LGL expansion, the detection of increased absolute cell counts by the TRBC1-FCM assay for more accurately defined subpopulations of T??-LGL-expressing individual TCRV? families, allows the detection of T-cell clonality, even in the absence of phenotypic aberrations.

Keywords

flow cytometry t-cell clonality assessmentjovi-1large granular lymphocyteslarge granular lymphocytic leukemialgllgllrepertoiret alpha beta effector cellst alpha beta-cell maturation stagest?? effector cellst??-cell maturation stagestcrv beta repertoiretcrv? repertoiretrbc1Flow cytometry t-cell clonality assessmentJovi-1Large granular lymphocytesLarge granular lymphocytic leukemiaLglLgllStandardizationT?? effector cellsT??-cell maturation stagesTcrv? repertoireTcrvβ repertoireTrbc1Tαβ effector cellsTαβ-cell maturation stages

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Cancers due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Oncology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.15. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 4.11 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-16, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 12
  • Scopus: 12
  • Europe PMC: 5
  • Google Scholar: 12

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-16:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 30 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Netherlands; Portugal; United States of America.