{rfName}

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion) of the Spanish Government (grant number: PID2019-107473RB-C21).The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Analysis of institutional authors

Arcone, VmAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Review

Effectiveness and Adherence to Physical Activity and Physical Exercise mHealth Interventions: A Systematic Review

Publicated to:Apunts. Educación Física Y Deportes. (151): 1-16 - 2023-03-01 (151), DOI: 10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2023/1).151.01

Authors: Pons, TC; Carrion, C; Fernández-Chimeno, M; Arcone, VM; Sánchez-Fuentes, JA; Pardo, EA

Affiliations

Ctr Invest Biomed Red Diabet & Enfermedades Metab, Madrid, Spain - Author
E Hlth Tel Espana, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Obes Unit, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Inst Invest Biomed August Pi Sunyer IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Natl Inst Phys Educ Catalonia INEFC, Barcelona Ctr, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Sport Res Inst, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Murcia, San Javier, Spain - Author
Univ Oberta Catalunya UOC, Sch Hlth Sci, eHlth Lab Res Grp, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Catalunya UPC, Biomed & Elect Instrumentat Grp, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Catalunya UPC, Elect Engn Dept, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Ramon Llull URL, Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

The inclusion of physical activity and physical exercise prescription in the field of mHealth offers a new field of research in an increasingly digitized society. In this context, it is necessary to assess the applicability, reliability and adequacy of the control variables and assessment, taking into account the criteria of individualization and specificity of the pathology. This systematic review was aimed to study the adherence and effectiveness of physical activity or physical exercise mHealth programs depending on its variables, communication channels and technological resources for randomized clinical trials performed from 2011 to 2021. A literature research was carried out using the Pubmed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar platforms following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Out of 865 initial results, 13 clinical studies were included in the analysis, related to cardiac (n = 4), oncological (n = 3), pulmonary n = 1), Parkinson's (n = 1) diseases, as well as the promotion of PA in sedentary people (n = 2), general population (n = 1) and pregnant women (n = 1). In relation to the effectiveness of the intervention, 9 of the final results (70%) showed differences of improvement in the experimental group. Workload is usually quantified with non-specific variables, with daily steps and the minutes of physical activity or exercise per day being the most common ones. The most used technological resources were specific applications and the FitBit (R) wristband. Main communication channels were SMS and the social network Facebook. However, there were no interventions specifically designed to meet technological capabilities of their target population. mHealth interventions had a greater effectiveness and adherence to prescription programs than in those prescribed in person or without technological support.

Keywords
AdherenceAdolescentsAdultsAppCongenital heart-diseaseEfficacyGuidelinesMhealthMobile-healthPhysical activityPhysical exercisePrevailProgramValidationWorkload

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Apunts. Educación Física Y Deportes due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2023, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Cultural Studies.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-05-12:

  • WoS: 1
  • Scopus: 1
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-12:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 87 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

    It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

    • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.