{rfName}

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Camprodon-Boadas, PatriciaAuthorDe La Serna, ElenaCorresponding AuthorBaeza, ImmaculadaAuthorIlzarbe, DanielAuthorPuig, OlgaAuthorAndres-Perpina, SusanaAuthorSugranyes, GiselaAuthorCastro-Fornieles, JosefinaCorresponding Author

Share

September 29, 2024
Publications
>
Article
No

Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire for Adolescents (CoRe-A)

Publicated to: Revista De Psiquiatria Y Salud Mental. 17 (3): 132-137 - 2024-09-16 17(3), DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2022.02.003

Authors:

Camprodon-Boadas, P; de la Serna, E; Baeza, I; Ilzarbe, D; Puig, O; Andrés-Perpiñá, S; Sugranyes, G; Castro-Fornieles, J
[+]

Affiliations

Ctr Invest Biomed Red Salud Mental, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Fundacio Clin Recerca Biomed, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Univ, Inst Clin Neurociencies, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat & Psychol, 2017SGR881, Barcelona, Spain - Author
IDIBAPS, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Barcelona, Dept Med, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Barcelona, Dept Psychol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Introduction: The objective is to design and analyze the psychometric properties of a new instrument, The Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire for Adolescents (CoRe-A), for assessing cognitive reserve in adolescents. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify cognitive reserve components, before items concerning them were discussed in terms of their suitability, relevance, and clarity. The final 12-item CoRe-A was subsequently validated among 48 adolescents diagnosed with severe mental disorders and 37 healthy controls matched by age and sex. Results: The CoRe-A scale showed a four-factor structure (i.e., education/occupation, sociability, school performance/development, and leisure activities) that explained 65.30% of the variance. It had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.767) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.979; p < 0.001). The patients with severe mental disorders obtained significantly lower scores than the healthy controls in both the total CoRe-A score and in the four factor scores. Moreover, the CoRe-A correctly classified 85.9% of the sample as patient with severe mental disorders or healthy control. The CoRe-A total score showed a large positive correlation with the Wechsler vocabulary subtest, demonstrating good convergent validity (r = 0.514; p < 0.001). Nevertheless, when vocabulary subtest and CoRe-A total score were compared, the CoRe-A reached a better discriminative capacity. Conclusions: The CoRe-A is a valid and reliable tool for assessing cognitive reserve in adolescents, and it may help to characterize adolescents diagnosed with a severe mental disorder. (c) 2022 SEP y SEPB. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
[+]

Keywords

Academic achievementAdolescentAdolescentsArticleChildreClinical articleCognitive defectCognitive reserveCognitive reserve questionnaire for adolescentConfirmatory factor analysisControlled studyConvergent validityCronbach alpha coefficientDepressionDisordersEducationEmotionalityFemaleGlasgow coma scaleHumanInternal consistencyLeisureLifetimeMaleMental diseaseNormal humanOccupationPhysical activityPredictorPsychometricPsychometricsPsychometryPsychosisPsychotic disordersQuality of lifeQuestionnaireScale validationSchizoaffective psychosisSchizophreniaSchizophrenia spectrum disorderSchizophreniform disorderSyndrome scale panssTest retest reliabilityWechsler adult intelligence scale

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Revista de Psiquiatria y Salud Mental due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2024 there are still no calculated indicators, but in 2023, it was in position 38/288, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Psychiatry.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2026-04-01:

  • WoS: 4
  • Scopus: 3
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-04-01:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 24 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

    [+]

    Leadership analysis of institutional authors

    There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Camprodon Boadas, Patricia) and Last Author (Castro Fornieles, Josefina).

    the authors responsible for correspondence tasks have been de la Serna Gómez, Elena and Castro Fornieles, Josefina.

    [+]

    Awards linked to the item

    This study was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI070066; PI1100683; PI1500467; PI17/00741; PI1800696; PI18/00976) , Ajut a la Recerca Pons Bartran (Fundacio Clinic recerca Biomedica) , Fundacio Marato TV3 (091630) , and the Catalonia Government (2017SGR881) , PERIS (SLT006/17/00346) . It was co-financed by ERDF Funds from the European Commission, "A way of making Europe" and from CIBER-SAM. These institutions had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
    [+]