{rfName}

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

Altmetrics

Grant support

RD21/0012/0024 (Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Maternal and Child Chronic Diseases of Perinatal and Developmental Origin: RICORS network) and co- funded by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund).RD21/0012/0024 (Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Maternal and Child Chronic Diseases of Perinatal and Developmental Origin: RICORS network) and co- funded by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund).

Analysis of institutional authors

Peguero, AnnaAuthorBarbera, AguedaAuthorFigueras, FrancescAuthor

Share

October 15, 2024
Publications
>
Article

Cook's balloon versus dinoprostone for Labour induction of term pregnancies with fetal GROWth restriction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in tertiary maternity hospitals in Spain (COLIGROW study)

Publicated to:Bmj Open. 14 (9): e089628- - 2024-09-30 14(9), DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089628

Authors: Herraiz, I; Villalain, C; Galindo, A; Barbero, P; Meler, E; Peguero, A; Figueras, F; Mazarico, E; Barberá, A; Bonacina, E; Blanco, JE; Sánchez, ML; Muñoz, IL; Pablos, DL

Affiliations

Clin Barcelona Hosp Clin, Inst Gynaecol Obstet & Neonatol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Fdn Invest Biomed Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, SCREN, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Univ Virgen Arrixaca, Obstet & Gynecol, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Fetal Med Unit, Obstet & Gynecol, Madrid, Spain - Author
IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Inst Invest Hosp 12 Octubre Imas12, Madrid, Spain - Author
Inst Murciano Invest Biosanit Virgen Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain - Author
Sant Joan De Deu Hosp, BCNatal Barcelona Ctr Maternal Fetal & Neonatal Me, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Med, Bellaterra, Spain - Author
Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Estudios Estadisticos, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Med, Dept Salud Publ & Materno Infantil, Madrid, Spain - Author
Vall Hebron Univ Hosp, Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Introduction Fetal growth restriction (FGR) affects about 3%-5% of term pregnancies. If prenatally detected and anterograde umbilical artery flow is preserved (stage I), it is recommended to deliver at term (>= 37+0 weeks). In the absence of contraindications, the vaginal route is preferred, and labour induction is usually required. It has been postulated that mechanical methods for cervical ripening may have an optimal profile for the induction of term FGR fetuses since they are associated with less uterine stimulation than the standard pharmacological methods, and therefore, could be better tolerated by fetuses with reduced placental reserve. This study aims to evaluate whether cervical ripening with a Cook's balloon for the induction of labour from 37+0 weeks of gestation in the stage I FGR manages to increase the rate of vaginal delivery compared with vaginal dinoprostone. Methods and analysis This will be an open-labelled, randomised, parallel-group clinical trial to be held in five Spanish maternities. Women aged >= 18 years with singleton pregnancies complicated with stage I FGR (defined as the presence of at least one of these two criteria: (1) estimated fetal weight (EFW)

Keywords

AdultArticleCerebroplacental ratioCervical ripeningCesarean sectionChromosome aberrationClinical protocolConsensusControlled studyDelivery, obstetricDiagnosisDinoprostoneDrug effectFemaleFetal growth retardationGestational ageGuidelinesHospitalHospitals, maternityHumanHumansIntention to treat analysisIntrauterine growth retardationLabor inductionLabor, inducedMajor clinical studyMaleManagementMaternal medicineObstetric deliveryOxytocic agentOxytocicsPerinatologyPregnancyPregnant womePregnant womenProceduresProstaglandin e2Pulsatility indexRandomized controlled trial (topic)Randomized controlled trials as topicRatiSmall for gestational ageSpainTertiary care centerTertiary care centersUmbilical arteryUmbilical artery pulsatility indexUterine cervix ripeningVaginal deliveryWeight

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Bmj Open due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2024 there are still no calculated indicators, but in 2023, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Medicine (Miscellaneous).

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-22:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 17.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 41 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.75.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 2 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (Figueras Retuerta, Francesc).