{rfName}
Sy

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Grant support

This study was supported by the Instituto de Salud CarlosIII-FIS research grants (PI16/00187, PI19/00236, PI19/00569, PI19/00685,PI19/00941, PI19/00954, PI19/01027, PI19/01256, PI19/01484, PI20/00229,PI23/01277, PI23/00822), co-funded by the European Regional DevelopmentFund (ERDF)"A Way to Build Europe"integrated into the Plan Nacional deI + D + I and cofinanced by the ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Evaluacion yconfinanciado por la Union Europea (FEDER, FSE, Next Generation EU/Plan deRecuperacion Transformacion y Resiliencia_PRTR); the Instituto de Salud CarlosIII; the CIBER of Mental Health (CIBERSAM); and the Secretaria d'Universitats iRecerca del Departament d'Economia i Coneixement (2021 SGR 01358), CERCAProgramme/Generalitat de Catalunyaas well as the FundacioClinic per la RecercaBiomedica (Pons Bartran 2022-FRCB_PB1_2022); the Government of the Prin-cipality of Asturias (grant ref.: PCTI-2018-2022 IDI/2018/235). It was alsosupported by an FPU grant (FPU20/01651) from the Spanish Ministry of Uni-versities and a Universidad Complutense de Madrid Predoctoral contract forresearch staff in training (CT82/20-CT83/20)

Analysis of institutional authors

Botí MáAuthorRoberto, NataliaAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Symptomatic networks in suicide attempt and reattempt: Relevance of psychiatric comorbidity

Publicated to:European Psychiatry. 68 (1): e4- - 2025-01-10 68(1), DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1807

Authors: Pemau, Andres; de la Torre-luque, Alejandro; Marin-Martin, Carolina; Diaz-Marsa, Marina; Andreo-Jover, Jorge; Ayad-Ahmed, Wala; Bravo Ortiz, Maria Fe; Bobes-Bascaran, Maria Teresa; Canal-Rivero, Manuel; Garcia, Irene Canosa; Cebria, Ana Isabel; Crespo-Facorro, Benedicto; Elices, Matilde; Gonzalez-Pinto, Ana; Grande, Iria; Jimenez-Trevino, Luis; Palao, Diego J; Palao-Tarrero, Angela; Perez-Guerra, Carla; Roberto, Natalia; Ruiz Veguilla, Miguel; Saiz, Pilar A; Perez, Victor

Affiliations

Ctr Biomed Res Mental Hlth CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Bipolar & Depress Disorders Unit, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp del Mar Med Res Inst IMIM, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp del Mar, Inst Salud Mental, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp La Paz Inst Hlth Res IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Univ Parc Tauli, Inst Invest & Innovacio Parc Tauli I3PT, Unitat Mixta Neurociencia Traslac, Sabadell, Spain - Author
Hosp Virgen del Rocio, IBIS, Seville, Spain - Author
Inst Deinvest Sanitaria Principado Asturias ISPA, Oviedo, Spain - Author
Inst Invest Biomed August Pi i Sunyer IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Inst Univ Neurociencias Principado Asturias INEURO, Oviedo, Spain - Author
La Paz Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat Clin Psychol & Mental Hlth, Madrid, Spain - Author
San Carlos Univ Clin Hosp, Madrid, Spain - Author
Serv Salud Principado Asturias SESPA, Oviedo, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat & Forens Med, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Psychol, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Madrid UAM, Dept Psychiat, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Barcelona UB, Inst Neurociencies, Dept Med, Fac Med & Ciencies Salut, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Basque Country, Hosp Univ Alava, Dept Psychiat, BIOARABA, Vitoria, Alava, Spain - Author
Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Personalidad Evaluac & Psicol Clin, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Complutense, Dept Med Legal Psiquiatria & Patol, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Oviedo, Dept Psychol, Oviedo, Spain - Author
Univ Seville, Seville, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Background One of the most relevant risk factors for suicide is the presence of previous attempts. The symptomatic profile of people who reattempt suicide deserves attention. Network analysis is a promising tool to study this field. Objective To analyze the symptomatic network of patients who have attempted suicide recently and compare networks of people with several attempts and people with just one at baseline. Methods 1043 adult participants from the Spanish cohort "SURVIVE" were part of this study. Participants were classified into two groups: single attempt group (n = 390) and reattempt group (n = 653). Different network analyses were carried out to study the relationships between suicidal ideation, behavior, psychiatric symptoms, diagnoses, childhood trauma, and impulsivity. A general network and one for each subgroup were estimated. Results People with several suicide attempts at baseline scored significantly higher across all clinical scales. The symptomatic networks were equivalent in both groups of patients (p > .05). Although there were no overall differences between the networks, some nodes were more relevant according to group belonging. Conclusions People with a history of previous attempts have greater psychiatric symptom severity but the relationships between risk factors show the same structure when compared with the single attempt group. All risk factors deserve attention regardless of the number of attempts, but assessments can be adjusted to better monitor the occurrence of reattempts.

Keywords
Acquired capabilityAdultAssociationBehaviorChildhood traumaComorbidityDisordersFemaleHumansImpulsivityInventoryMaleMental disordersMetaanalysisMiddle agedMultisitNetwork analysisRecurrenceRisk factorsSexual-abuseSpainSuicidal ideationSuicideSuicide reattemptSuicide, attemptedTraumTraumaValidation

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal European Psychiatry due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position 15/279, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Psychiatry. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-15:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 5.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 5 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 12.85.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 6 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.