{rfName}
Na

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

3

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Alobid, IsamAuthorBernal-Sprekelsen, ManuelAuthor

Share

February 26, 2025
Publications
>
Article
No

Nasal endoscopy score thresholds to trigger consideration of chronic rhinosinusitis treatment escalation and implications for disease control

Publicated to:Rhinology. 63 (1): - 2025-01-01 63(1), DOI: 10.4193/Rhin24.291

Authors: Sedaghat, Ahmad R; Cotter, Ryan A; Alobid, Isam; Alsaleh, Saad; Anselmo-Lima, Wilma Terezinha; Bernal-Sprekelsen, Manuel; Chandra, Rakesh K; Constantinidis, Jannis; Fokkens, Wytske J; Franzese, Christine; Gray, Stacey T; Halderman, Ashleigh A; Holbrook, Eric H; Hopkins, Claire; Hwang, Peter H; Kuan, Edward C; Landis, Basile N; Lund, Valerie J; Mccoul, Edward D; Niederberger-Leppin, Verena; O'Brien, Erin K; Philpott, Carl M; Pletche, Steven D; Pynnonen, Melissa A; Rimmer, Joanne; Toppila-Salmi, Sanna; Wang, Eric W; Wang, Marilene B; Wise, Sarah K; Woodworth, Bradford A; Yao, William C; Phillips, Katie M

Affiliations

Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hosp, Dept ORL Head & Neck S 1urg, Thessaloniki, Greece - Author
Barcelona Univ, Hosp Clin, ENT Dept, CIBERES,Rhinol & Skull Base Unit,August Pi i Sunye, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Emory Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Atlanta, GA USA - Author
Great Yarmouth & Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, James Paget Univ Hosp, Norwich, England - Author
Guys & St Thomas Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, London, England - Author
Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Boston, MA USA - Author
Helsinki Univ Hosp, Inflammat Ctr, Dept Allergy, Helsinki, Finland - Author
King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - Author
Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Kuopio, Finland - Author
Mayo Clin, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Rochester, MN USA - Author
Med Univ Vienna, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Vienna, Austria - Author
Monash Hlth, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Melbourne, Australia - Author
Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Australia - Author
Ochsner Clin Fdn, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, New Orleans, LA USA - Author
St Vincents Hosp Melbourne, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Melbourne, Australia - Author
Stanford Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA - Author
Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Otolaryngol, Birmingham, AL USA - Author
Univ Amsterdam, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands - Author
Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Secc ORL, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Orange, CA USA - Author
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA - Author
Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, San Francisco, CA USA - Author
Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Med Sci Bldg Room 6410,231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA - Author
Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Royal Natl ENT Hosp, London, England - Author
Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Genet Epidemiol, Norwich, England - Author
Univ Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland - Author
Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland - Author
Univ Hosp Geneva, Otorhinolaryngol Dept, Rhinol Olfactol Unit, Geneva, Switzerland - Author
Univ Michigan, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA - Author
Univ Missouri, Dept Otolaryngol, Columbia, MO USA - Author
Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA USA - Author
Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil - Author
Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Houston, TX USA - Author
Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Dallas, TX USA - Author
Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Nashville, TN USA - Author
See more

Abstract

Background: In the absence of direct evidence supporting how to use nasal endoscopy findings to judge chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) disease control, experts' practice patterns could provide guidance. Methodology: Participants consisted of a diverse group of twenty-nine rhinologists. Participants were presented with every possible combination of bilateral nasal endoscopy findings represented by the modified Lund-Kennedy (MLK; range: 0-12) endoscopic scoring system and Nasal Polyp Score (NPS; range: 0-8). Reflecting the practical consequence of CRS disease control assessment, participants were asked whether they would consider CRS treatment escalation based on each scenario in the absence of any CRS symptoms, and how strongly they considered escalating therapy. The same scenarios were then presented in the context of 1 burdensome CRS symptom and participants again were asked whether they would consider treatment escalation. Results: The median threshold total MLK score for considering treatment escalation was >= 4 and 75.9% of participants' MLK thresholds were within 1 point of 4.The median threshold total NPS for considering treatment escalation was >= 3 and 62.5% of participants' NPS thresholds were within 1 point of 3. Endoscopy score thresholds decreased in the presence of 1 burdensome symptom and generally increased when requiring stronger affirmation for considering CRS treatment escalation. Conclusion: Reflecting the practice patterns of a diverse group of rhinologists, MLK score >= 4 or NPS >= 3 may serve as thresholds for considering CRS treatment escalation. Alternatively, MLK score

Keywords

Chronic rhinosinusitisControlLifLund-kennedy scoreNasal endoscopyNasal polyp scoreOutcome measurReliability

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Rhinology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position 1/67, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Otorhinolaryngology. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-08-06:

  • WoS: 2

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-06:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 2.

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Australia; Austria; Brazil; Finland; Greece; Netherlands; Saudi Arabia; Switzerland; United Kingdom; United States of America.