Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Share

Ultrasound-guided minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants: outcomes and challenges

Publicated to:Quantitative Imaging In Medicine And Surgery. 14 (11): 7791-7802 - 2024-11-01 14(11), DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-356

Authors: Soler-Perromat, Juan Carlos; Isern-Kebschull, Jaime; del Amo, Montserrat; Bartolome-Solanas, Alvaro; Rios, Jose; de Guirior, Cristian; Carmona, Francisco; Garcia-Diez, Ana-Isabel; Porta-Vilaro, Marta; Tomas, Xavier

Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Contraceptive arm implants, such as Implanon NXT (R)/Nexplanon (R), are reversible methods of birth control that have gained global popularity, with over 20 million worldwide users. While palpable implants can be easily removed, deep or non-palpable implants pose complications during extraction, often requiring open surgery. This ultrasound-guided removal technique offers a minimally invasive, safe, and effective alternative, providing real-time control over the implant and neurovascular structures. Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and challenges of this implant removal method. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, all cases referred to our institution for ultrasoundguided removal of contraceptive implants, from June 2022 to December 2023, were reviewed. Our facility serves as a referral center for handling challenging implants. Twenty-nine women with contraceptive implants were referred for implant removal in this period of time. Thirty implants were sent for removal in total (one patient had a double implant). Data specific to the patients were collected: age and body mass index (BMI). Data specific to the implant were also collected: time since implant insertion (months), history of a previous removal attempt, type of implant (single or double rod), implant palpability, laterality of the implant, supra or subfascial location, success or failure of the ultrasound-guided removal procedure and presence of complications in the post-procedure. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between the procedure success rate and these variables, and also between these variables and the supra or subfascial location of the implant. Results: Twenty-six of the 30 implants (86.67%) were successfully removed with this fully ultrasoundguided technique. In cases where the implant could not be removed, there was a higher rate of subfascial implant location (75%), while in cases where the removal was successful, the rate of subfascial implant location was significantly lower at 19.23% (P=0.048). Patients whose implants could be removed had a median BMI of 23.71 kg/m2, which was higher than the BMI of patients whose implants could not be removed (20.82 kg/m2), with a P=0.022. No complications were registered. Conclusions: Percutaneous real-time ultrasound-guided implant removal is effective, safe and offers a minimally-invasive alternative to open surgery. The removal of subfascial implants is also feasible but more challenging, leading to a reduction of success rate in this group. These positive outcomes suggest its potential as a standard initial approach for deep contraceptive implant removal.

Keywords