{rfName}
Ca

Indexed in

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Esmatjes, EAuthor

Share

August 30, 2025
Publications
>
Article
No

Cardiovascular outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial of patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy

Publicated to: Annals Of Internal Medicine. 138 (7): 542-549 - 2003-04-01 138(7), DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-7-200304010-00010

Authors:

Berl, T; Hunsicker, LG; Lewis, JB; Pfeffer, MA; Porush, JG; Rouleau, JL; Drury, PL; Esmatjes, E; Hricik, D; Parikh, CR; Raz, I; Vanhille, P; Wiegmann, TB; Wolfe, BM; Locatelli, F; Goldhaber, SZ; Lewis, EJ
[+]

Affiliations

- Author

Abstract

Background: Patients with diabetes have increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are protective in type 1 diabetes. However, no definitive studies have examined the use of angiotensin-receptor blockers; in patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. The primary outcomes of the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial were doubling of serum creatinine levels, end-stage renal disease, and death from any cause. Objective: To compare rates of cardiovascular events among patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy who received conventional anti hypertensive therapy with an angiotensin-receptor blocker (irbesartan) or a calcium-channel blocker (amlodipine), or placebo. Design: Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a median follow-up of 2.6 years. A time event analysis was used. Setting: 209 centers in the Americas, Europe, Israel, and Australasia. Participants: 1715 adults with type 2 diabetic nephropathy and hypertension; serum creatinine levels of 89 mumol/L (1.0 mg/dL) to 266 mumol/L (3.0 mg/dL) in women and 106 mumol/L (1.2 mg/dL) to 266 mumol/L (3.0 mg/dL) in men; and urinary protein excretion rates of at least 900 mg/d. Intervention: Treatment with irbesartan, amlodipine, or placebo. Measurements: Time to cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, strokes, and coronary revascularization. Results: The three groups were not statistically different in the composite of cardiovascular events. Among the components of the composite, there was a trend toward a decrease in strokes in patients receiving amlodipine versus those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% Cl, 0.35 to 1.22]; P = 0.18). Likewise, patients receiving amlodipine had a significantly lower rate of myocardial infarction when compared with placebo recipients (hazard ratio, 0.58 [Cl, 0.37 to 0.92]; P = 0.02). In contrast, patients receiving irbesartan had a significantly lower incidence of congestive heart failure when compared with placebo recipients (hazard ratio, 0.72 [Cl, 0.52 to 1.00]; P = 0.048) or amlodipine recipients (hazard ratio, 0.65 [Cl, 0.48 to 0.87]; P = 0.004). Conclusion: The composite cardiovascular event rate did not differ in patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy treated with irbesartan, amlodipine, or placebo in addition to conventional anti hypertensive therapy.
[+]

Keywords

Ace-inhibitorsAmlodipineAngiotensin iiAngiotensin receptor antagonistsAntihypertensive agentsAntihypertensive drugsBiphenyl compoundsCalcium channel blockersCardiovascular diseasesConverting-enzyme-inhibitionCreatinineDiabetes mellitus, type 2Diabetic angiopathiesDiabetic nephropathiesDouble-blind methodEnd-point reductionFemaleFollow-up studiesHumansHypertensioHypertensionIrbesartanKidney failure, chronicLosartan interventionMaleMiddle agedOld patientsPlacebosRandomized-trialRisk factorsSwedish trialTetrazolesTherapeutic benefitsTreatment outcome

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2003, it was in position 4/102, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Medicine, General & Internal.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2026-04-05:

  • WoS: 331
  • Scopus: 336
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-04-05:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 145.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 150 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 37.
  • The number of mentions in news outlets: 1 (Altmetric).
[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: United States of America.

[+]