{rfName}
Cu

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Masanes FAuthorSalva AAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Cut-off points for muscle mass — not grip strength or gait speed — determine variations in sarcopenia prevalence

Publicated to:Journal Of Nutrition Health & Aging. 21 (7): 825-829 - 2017-07-01 21(7), DOI: 10.1007/s12603-016-0844-5

Authors: Masanes, F; Rojano i Luque, X; Salva, A; Serra-Rexach, J A; Artaza, I; Formiga, F; Cuesta, F; Lopez Soto, A; Ruiz, D; Cruz-Jentoft, A J

Affiliations

Hosp Clin Barcelona, Clin Inst Med & Dermatol, Geriatr Unit Internal Med, Barcelona, Spain      Hospital Clinic de Barcelona    University of Barcelona - Author
Hosp Clin San Carlos IdISSC, Serv Geriatria, Madrid, Spain      Hospital Clinico San Carlos - Author
Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maran IISGM, Serv Geriatria, Madrid, Spain - Author
Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Geriatr Unit, Barcelona, Spain      Hospital of Santa Creu i Sant Pau - Author
Hosp Univ Bellvitge IDIBELL, Dept Internal Med, Geriatr Unit, Barcelona, Spain      Catalan Health Institute    Bellvitge University Hospital    Institut d'Investigacio Biomedica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL) - Author
Hosp Univ Ramon & Cajal IRYCIS, Serv Geriatria, Madrid, Spain      Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal - Author
Igurco Serv Sociosanit, Bilbao, Spain - Author
Inst Biomed Res St Pau, Barcelona, Spain       - Author
Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain      Hospital Clinic de Barcelona    IDIBAPS    University of Barcelona - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fac Med, Barcelona, Spain      Autonomous University of Barcelona    University of Barcelona - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fundacio Salut & Envelliment, Barcelona, Spain      Autonomous University of Barcelona       - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fundacio Salut & Envelliment, Inst Biomed Res St Pau, Barcelona, Spain.      Autonomous University of Barcelona - Author
Univ Barcelona, Fac Med, Barcelona, Spain      University of Barcelona - Author
Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Med, Madrid, Spain      Complutense University of Madrid       - Author
See more

Abstract

To study the importance of weight change with regard to mortality in older people.Prospective cohort study.The cohort includes participants in the Hordaland Health Study, Norway, 1997-99 (N=2935, age 71-74 years) who had previously participated in a survey in 1992-93.Participants with weight measured at both surveys were followed for mortality through 2012. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate risk of death according to changes in weight. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for people with stable weight (± <5% weight change) were compared to people who lost (?5%) or gained (?5%) weight. Cox regression with penalized spline was used to evaluate the association between weight change (in kg) and mortality. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and previous myocardial infarction or stroke. Participants with cancer were excluded.Compared to those with stable weight, participants who lost ?5% weight had an increased mortality risk (HR 1.59 [95% CI: 1.35-1.89]) while the group with weight gain ?5% did not (HR 1.07 [95% CI 0.90-1.28]). Penalized spline identified those who lost more than about three kg or gained more than about 12 kg as having increased risk of death.Even a minor weight loss of ?5% or >3 kg were significantly associated with increased risk of mortality. Thus, weight should be routinely measured in older adults.

Keywords

comparabilityepidemiologymortalityolder peopleperformancesarcopeniaweight lossBioelectrical-impedance analysisComparabilityDisabilityEpidemiologyMortalityOlder peoplePerformancePredictionSarcopeniaScreeningWeight gainWeight loss

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Journal Of Nutrition Health & Aging due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2017, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Medicine (Miscellaneous).

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 2.16. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 2.74 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 26.48 (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-11, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 67
  • Scopus: 78
  • Europe PMC: 12
  • OpenCitations: 76

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-11:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 174.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 172 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 2.75.
  • The number of mentions on the social network Facebook: 1 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 5 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Masanès Toran, Ferran) .