{rfName}
TW

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Llorens Bellés, VíctorAuthorMesquida MCorresponding AuthorMolins BAuthorHernandez MvAuthorEspinosa GAuthorSainz De La Maza MAuthorAdan AAuthor

Share

May 23, 2017
Publications
>
Article
No

TWENTY-FOUR MONTH FOLLOW-UP OF TOCILIZUMAB THERAPY FOR REFRACTORY UVEITIS-RELATED MACULAR EDEMA.

Publicated to:Retina-The Journal Of Retinal And Vitreous Diseases. 38 (7): 1361-1370 - 2018-07-01 38(7), DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001690

Authors: Mesquida, Marina; Molins, Blanca; Llorenc, Victor; Hernandez, Maria V; Espinosa, Gerard; Sainz De la Maza, Maite; Adan, Alfredo

Affiliations

Hosp Clin Barcelona, Autoimmune Dis Dept, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Clin Oftalmol, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Rheumatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain - Author
IDIBAPS, Fundacio Clin Recerca Biomed, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

To report the 24-month efficacy and safety of the interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab (TCZ) for refractory uveitis-related macular edema (ME).Data were obtained by standardized chart review. Patients with quiescent uveitis seen at a single tertiary referral center, for whom ME was the principal cause of reduced visual acuity.Central foveal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography; degree of anterior and posterior chamber; inflammation (Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group criteria); and visual acuity (Snellen and logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) were recorded in all patients during TCZ therapy at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24.Sixteen eyes from 12 patients (10 women) were included. Mean age was 34.6 years. Mean duration of ME was 13.2 years. All patients achieved 24 months of follow-up and that is the census date for data collection. Before TCZ was commenced, ME was present, and all patients had been previously treated with immunosuppressive therapy and biologic agents. Uveitis diagnoses were juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated, uveitis (n = 6), birdshot chorioretinopathy (n = 2), idiopathic panuveitis (n = 2), sympathetic ophthalmia (n = 1), and ankylosing spondylitis (n = 1). Mean central foveal thickness (95%; confidence interval) was 516 ± 55 ?m at baseline, improving to 274 ± 13 at Month 12 (P = 0.0004), and sustained at 274 ± 14 at Month 24 of follow-up (P = 0.00039). Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.78 ± 0.18 (Snellen 20/120 ± 20/30) at baseline to 0.42 ± 0.17 (20/52 ± 20/30) at Month 12 (P = 0.0001) and 0.40 ± 0.17 (20/50 ± 20/30) at Month 24 of follow-up (P = 0.0002). Tocilizumab therapy was withdrawn in 5 patients with sustained remission at Month 12 but in all, ME relapsed between 1 and 3 months after TCZ discontinuation. Rechallenge of TCZ infusions led to recovery of uveitis control and ME resolution. Two adverse events were reported during two 4-month follow-ups: one Grade 1 neutropenia and one community-acquired pneumonia.In this long-term study, TCZ was effective and had a comparable safety profile to published data for TCZ use in other indications, when used for the treatment of refractory uveitis-related ME.

Keywords

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, monoclonal, humanizedDose-response relationship, drugFemaleFluorescein angiographyFollow-up studiesFovea centralisFundus oculiHumansInjections, intravenousInterleukin-6Macular edemaMaleMiddle agedOcular inflammationRetrospective studiesTime factorsTocilizumabTomography, optical coherenceTreatment outcomeUveitisVisual acuityYoung adult

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Retina-The Journal Of Retinal And Vitreous Diseases due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2018, it was in position 8/60, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Ophthalmology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 3.56. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 1.25 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 19.38 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-09, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 61
  • Scopus: 35
  • Europe PMC: 25

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-09:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 64.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 66 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 2.6.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 3 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Mesquida Febrer, Marina) and Last Author (Adán Civera, Alfredo).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Mesquida Febrer, Marina.