{rfName}
Sa

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

Horizon 20/20 European programme.

Analysis of institutional authors

Domenech Gomez, GemmaAuthorPose EAuthorNapoleone LAuthorCarol MAuthorPich JAuthorDomenech GAuthorLlopis MAuthorTorres FAuthorSola EAuthorGines PCorresponding Author
Share
Publications
>
Article

Safety of two different doses of simvastatin plus rifaximin in decompensated cirrhosis (LIVERHOPE-SAFETY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Publicated to:Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 5 (1): 31-41 - 2020-01-01 5(1), DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30320-6

Authors: Pose, E; Napoleone, L; Carol, M; Llopis, M; Solà, E; Ginès, P; Amin, A; Mookerjee, RP; Campion, D; Alessandria, C; Jimenez, C; Vargas, V; Piano, S; Angeli, P; Roux, O; Durand, F; Uschner, FE; Trebicka, J; de Wit, K; Beuers, U; Zaccherini, G; Bernardi, M; Caraceni, P; Andrade, RJ; Pich, J; Ferrero, J; Domenech, G; Torres, F; Kamath, PS; Abraldes, JG

Affiliations

Alma Mater Studiorum Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Bologna, Italy - Author
European Clin Res Infrastruct Network, Paris, France - Author
European Fdn Study Chron Liver Failure, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Internal Med 1, Frankfurt, Germany - Author
Hosp Beaujon, AP HP, Hepatol & Liver Intens Care Unit, Clichy, France - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Clin Pharmacol Dept, Clin Trials Unit, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Biostat & Data Management Core Facil, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Inst Bioengn Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer IDIBAP, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Hepat & Digest, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rochester, MN USA - Author
UCL, Inst Liver & Digest Hlth, London, England - Author
Univ Alberta, Div Gastroenterol Liver Unit, CEGIIR, Cirrhosis Care Clin, Edmonton, AB, Canada - Author
Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands - Author
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp Vall dHebron & Vall dHebron Res Unit VHIR, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Hepat & Digest, Liver Unit, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin Barcelona, Liver Unit, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Bonn, Dept Internal Med 1, Bonn, Germany - Author
Univ Malaga, Hosp Univ Virgen Victoria, Inst Invest Biomed Malaga IBIMA, CIBERehd, Malaga, Spain - Author
Univ Padua, Dept Med DIMED, UIMH, Padua, Italy - Author
Univ Turin, Citta Salute & Sci Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Turin, Italy - Author
See more

Abstract

Statins have beneficial effects on intrahepatic circulation and decrease portal hypertension and rifaximin modulates the gut microbiome and might prevent bacterial translocation in patients with cirrhosis. Therefore, this drug combination might be of therapeutic benefit in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. However, there is concern regarding the safety of statins in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. We assessed the safety of two different doses of simvastatin, in combination with rifaximin, in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and moderate-to-severe liver failure from nine university hospitals in six European countries (Italy, France, Holland, Germany, the UK, and Spain). Patients older than 18 years with Child-Pugh class B or C disease were eligible. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) to receive either simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day, simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day, or placebo of both medications for 12 weeks. Randomisation was stratified according to Child-Pugh class (B vs C) and restricted using blocks of multiples of three. The primary endpoint was development of liver or muscle toxicity, as defined by changes in liver aminotransferases (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT]), alkaline phosphastase, and creatine kinase. The study is registered with the European Union Clinical Trials Register, 2016-004499-23, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03150459.The study recruitment period was between July 28, 2017, and Jan 2, 2018. Follow-up finished on March 12, 2018. 50 patients were randomly assigned to simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day (n=18), simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day (n=16), or placebo of both medications (n=16). Six patients (two from each group) were excluded. Therefore, the full analysis set included 44 patients (16 in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day group, 14 in the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin mg/day group, and 14 in the placebo group). After a safety analyses when the first ten patients completed treatment, treatment was stopped prematurely in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group due to recommendations by the data safety monitoring board. Patients in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group showed a significant increase in AST and ALT compared with the placebo group (mean differences between the groups at the end of treatment for AST 130 IU/L [95% CI 54 to 205; p=0·0009] and for ALT 61 IU/L [22 to 100; p=0·0025]. We observed no significant differences at 12 weeks in AST and ALT between the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin and placebo group (for AST -14 IU/L [-91 to 64; p=0·728] and for ALT -8 IU/L [-49 to 33; p=0·698]). We observed no significant differences in alkaline phosphatase between the the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin or the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin groups compared with placebo. Patients in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group showed an increase in creatine kinase at the end of treatment compared with patients in the placebo group (1009 IU/L [208 to 1809]; p=0·014). We observed no significant changes in creatine kinase in the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin group (4·2 IU/L [-804 to 813]; p=0·992). Three (19%) patients in the simvastatin 40 mg/day group developed liver and muscle toxicity consistent with rhabdomyolysis. The number of patients who stopped treatment because of adverse events was significantly higher in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group (nine [56%] of 16 patients) compared with the other two groups (two [14%] of 14 for both groups; p=0·017). There were no serious unexpected adverse reactions reported during the study.Treatment with simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin in patients with decompensated cirrhosis was associated with a significant increase in adverse events requiring treatment withdrawal, particularly rhabdomyolysis, compared with simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin. We recommend simvastatin 20 mg/day as the dose to be used in studies investigating the role of statins in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.Horizon 20/20 European programme.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords
atorvastatinhemodynamicspharmacokineticsratsstatinstherapyAtorvastatinDose-response relationship, drugDouble-blind methodDrug therapy, combinationFollow-up studiesGastrointestinal agentsHemodynamicsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-coa reductase inhibitorsHypertension, portalLiver cirrhosisPharmacokineticsPortal pressurePortal-hypertensionRatsRifaximinSimvastatinStatinsTherapyTreatment outcome

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2020, it was in position 5/92, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Gastroenterology & Hepatology. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 4.03. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 5.5 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 34.21 (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-13, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 86
  • Scopus: 104
  • Europe PMC: 49
  • OpenCitations: 80
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-13:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 179.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 179 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 67.65.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 67 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Canada; France; Germany; Italy; Netherlands; United Kingdom; United States of America.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Pose Mendez, Elisa) and Last Author (Ginès Gibert, Pere).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Ginès Gibert, Pere.