{rfName}
JA

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Grant support

This research was funded by the DFG Research Unit FOR1961 (Control-T; HE3553/4-2) and the DFG CRC SFB 1076 (Project B9), by the Koln Fortune program, by the Fritz Thyssen Foundation (10.15.2.034MN), by the Academy of Finland (grants 292611,295504, 310507, 326238), and by the Cancer Society of Finland. This work was also supported by the EU Transcan-2 consortium 'ERANET-PLL' and by the ERAPerMed consortium 'JAKSTAT-TARGET'. A.S. is funded by a scholarship through the Jose Carreras Leukemia Foundation (DJCLS 03 F/2016).

Analysis of institutional authors

Lopez, CristinaAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Other

JAK/STAT-Activating Genomic Alterations Are a Hallmark of T-PLL

Publicated to:Cancers. 11 (12): 1833- - 2019-12-01 11(12), DOI: 10.3390/cancers11121833

Authors: Wahnschaffe, Linus; Braun, Till; Timonen, Sanna; Giri, Anil K.; Schrader, Alexandra; Wagle, Prerana; Almusa, Henrikki; Johansson, Patricia; Bellanger, Dorine; Lopez, Cristina; Haferlach, Claudia; Stern, Marc-Henri; Duerig, Jan; Siebert, Reiner; Mustjoki, Satu; Aittokallio, Tero; Herling, Marco;

Affiliations

Abstract

T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a rare and poor-prognostic mature T-cell leukemia. Recent studies detected genomic aberrations affecting JAK and STAT genes in T-PLL. Due to the limited number of primary patient samples available, genomic analyses of the JAK/STAT pathway have been performed in rather small cohorts. Therefore, we conducted-via a primary-data based pipeline-a meta-analysis that re-evaluated the genomic landscape of T-PLL. It included all available data sets with sequence information on JAK or STAT gene loci in 275 T-PLL. We eliminated overlapping cases and determined a cumulative rate of 62.1% of cases with mutated JAK or STAT genes. Most frequently, JAK1 (6.3%), JAK3 (36.4%), and STAT5B (18.8%) carried somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), with missense mutations in the SH2 or pseudokinase domains as most prevalent. Importantly, these lesions were predominantly subclonal. We did not detect any strong association between mutations of a JAK or STAT gene with clinical characteristics. Irrespective of the presence of gain-of-function (GOF) SNVs, basal phosphorylation of STAT5B was elevated in all analyzed T-PLL. Fittingly, a significant proportion of genes encoding for potential negative regulators of STAT5B showed genomic losses (in 71.4% of T-PLL in total, in 68.4% of T-PLL without any JAK or STAT mutations). They included DUSP4, CD45, TCPTP, SHP1, SOCS1, SOCS3, and HDAC9. Overall, considering such losses of negative regulators and the GOF mutations in JAK and STAT genes, a total of 89.8% of T-PLL revealed a genomic aberration potentially explaining enhanced STAT5B activity. In essence, we present a comprehensive meta-analysis on the highly prevalent genomic lesions that affect genes encoding JAK/STAT signaling components. This provides an overview of possible modes of activation of this pathway in a large cohort of T-PLL. In light of new advances in JAK/STAT inhibitor development, we also outline translational contexts for harnessing active JAK/STAT signaling, which has emerged as a 'secondary' hallmark of T-PLL.

Keywords

jakjak-stat pathwaymeta-analysismutationsrevealsstatstat5b signalingt-cell leukemiat-pllCell prolymphocytic leukemiaJakJak-stat pathwayMeta-analysisMutationsRevealsStatStat5b signalingT-cell leukemiaT-pll

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Cancers due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2019, it was in position 37/244, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Oncology.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.16. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 11.63 (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-30, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 33
  • Scopus: 45
  • Europe PMC: 24
  • OpenCitations: 41

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-30:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 43.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 42 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 3.

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Finland; France; Germany.