{rfName}

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Grant support

We thank the support received from the Welfare Projects Division of the La Caixa Foundation to the Molecular Therapeutics Research Unit (UITM) . We thank Anna Sunol for her contribution in sample management in VHIO Breast Cancer Unit and Daniel Zingg (Jos Jonker's laboratory, NKI) for helpful discussion. Figures were elaborated using Servier Medical Art. This work was cofunded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII-FEDER, PI15/00360, to J. Rodon) and Grants4Targets Bayer (2015-08-1441, to C. Hierro) . The 360 degrees FGFR Resistance project was partly funded by the CIBOT program from Novartis. The project has also received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement number 675392 to M. Graupera. V. Serra is supported by the ISCIII (CPII19/00033, PI20/00892) , the Catalan Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR, 2017 SGR 540) , a GHD-Pink Grant and the FERO Foundation. C. Saura received support from the Department of Health (Generalitat de Catalunya, SLT006/17/224) . The authors acknowledge the Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities and equipment.

Analysis of institutional authors

Brasó-Maristany FAuthorPrat AAuthor

Share

October 8, 2021
Publications
>
Article

High FGFR1-4 mRNA expression levels correlate with response to selective FGFR inhibitors in breast cancer

Publicated to:Clinical Cancer Research. 28 (1): 137-149 - 2022-01-01 28(1), DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1810

Authors: Sánchez-Guixé, M; Hierro, C; Jiménez, J; Viaplana, C; Villacampa, G; Monelli, E; Brasó-Maristany, F; Ogbah, Z; Parés, M; Guzmán, M; Grueso, J; Rodríguez, O; Oliveira, M; Azaro, A; Garralda, E; Tabernero, J; Casanovas, O; Scaltriti, M; Prat, A; Dienstmann, R; Nuciforo, P; Saura, C; Graupera, M; Vivancos, A; Rodon, J; Serra, V

Affiliations

Ctr Invest Biomed Red Canc CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Med Oncol Dept, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Inst Invest Biomed Bellvitge IDIBELL, Oncobell Program, ProCURE, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA - Author
Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Human Oncol & Pathogenesis Program, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA - Author
Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Inst Personalized Canc Therapy, Houston, TX 77030 USA - Author
Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Invest Canc Therapeut Dept, Houston, TX 77030 USA - Author
Vall dHebron Inst Oncol VHIO, Breast Canc Grp, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Vall dHebron Inst Oncol VHIO, Canc Genom Grp, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Vall dHebron Inst Oncol VHIO, Expt Therapeut Grp, CELLEX Bldg,C Natzaret 115-117, Barcelona 08035, Spain - Author
Vall dHebron Inst Oncol VHIO, Mol Oncol Grp, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Vall dHebron Inst Oncol VHIO, Mol Therapeut Res Unit, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Vall dHebron Inst Oncol VHIO, Oncol Data Sci, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Vall dHebron Univ Hosp VHUH, Med Oncol Dept, Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

FGFR1 amplification (FGFR1amp) is recurrent in metastatic breast cancer (BC) and is associated with resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MTKI) and selective pan-FGFR inhibitors (FGFRi) are being developed for FGFR1amp BC. High-level FGFR amplification and protein expression by IHC have identified BC responders to FGFRi or MTKI, respectively.Here, we used preclinical models and patient samples to identify predictive biomarkers to these drugs. We evaluated the antitumor activity of an FGFRi and an MTKI in a collection of seventeen BC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) harboring amplification in FGFR1/2/3/4 and in ten patients receiving either an FGFRi/MTKI. mRNA levels were measured on FFPE tumor samples using two commercial strategies. Proliferation and angiogenesis were evaluated by detecting Ki-67 and CD31 in viable areas by immunofluorescence.High FGFR1-4 mRNA levels but not copy number alteration (CNA) associated with FGFRi response. Treatment with MTKI showed higher response rates than with FGFRi (86% vs 53%), regardless of the FGFR1-4 mRNA levels. FGFR-addicted PDXs exhibited an antiproliferative response to either FGFRi or MTKI, and PDXs exclusively sensitive to MTKI exhibited an additional anti-angiogenic response. Consistently, clinical benefit of MTKI was not associated with high FGFR1-4 mRNA levels and it was observed in patients previously treated with anti-angiogenic drugs.Tailored therapy with FGFRi in molecularly-selected metastatic BC based on high FGFR1-4 mRNA levels warrants prospective validation in luminal BC CDK4/6i-resistant patients and in TNBC patients without targeted therapeutic options.Copyright ©2021, American Association for Cancer Research.

Keywords

11q138p12lucitanibresistancesensitivitytargetstraptrialtumorsAmplificationBreast neoplasmsBreast tumorFemaleFgfr1 protein, humanFibroblast growth factor receptor 1GeneticsHumanHumansMessenger rnaPathologyProtein kinase inhibitorProtein kinase inhibitorsReceptor protein-tyrosine kinasesReceptor, fibroblast growth factor, type 1Rna, messengerSignal transduction

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Clinical Cancer Research due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position 22/241, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Oncology. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.53. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 1.2 (source consulted: FECYT Feb 2024)
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 7.52 (source consulted: Dimensions Aug 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-08-02, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 16
  • Scopus: 15
  • Europe PMC: 7

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-02:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 18.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 20 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.75.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 5 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: United States of America.