{rfName}
Ef

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Castelo-Branco, CCorresponding AuthorCasals, GAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Efficacy and safety of ibuprofen arginine in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea

Publicated to:Clinical Drug Investigation. 24 (7): 385-393 - 2004-01-01 24(7), DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200424070-00002

Authors: Castelo-Branco, C; Casals, G; Haya, J; Cancelo, MJ; Manasanch, J

Affiliations

- Author

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibuprofen arginate in the treatment of patients with primary dysmenorrhoea in normal clinical practice. Study design: In this open trial, patients received an initial oral dose of ibuprofen arginine 600mg at the onset of pain, followed by the same dose every 6 hours, if necessary, with a maximum daily dose of 2400mg. The study assessed the evolution of pain intensity, rapidity of action, need for supplementary analgesics, decrease in working or school hours lost, and safety and tolerability of ibuprofen arginine treatment. Each patient was evaluated prior to inclusion in the study and after one and three cycles. Results: From the 1093 recruited patients; 854 women were evaluable for safety and tolerability, and 838 for efficacy. Significant improvement in pain relief was observed 15 minutes after treatment compared with baseline values (p < 0.001). At 15 and 30 minutes the percentage of patients reporting a marked decrease in pain intensity was 82.2% and 97.6%, respectively. Additionally, a significant reduction in absenteeism from work or school (from a mean of 4.6-0.8 hours per cycle) was observed (p < 0.001). Thirty-eight patients presented with adverse events in the trial period, but only 26 subjects (3% of 854) in the adverse events cohort reported having a possible adverse event, with gastrointestinal complaints being the most frequent. Conclusion: Ibuprofen arginine appears to be effective, fast, safe and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with primary dysmenorrhoea.

Keywords
Analgesic efficacyArginateDiclofenacDouble-blindNonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugsOnsePainTolerability

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Clinical Drug Investigation due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2004, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Medicine (Miscellaneous). Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q4 for the agency WoS (JCR) in the category Pharmacology & Pharmacy.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.03, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-24, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 5
  • Scopus: 8
  • Europe PMC: 4
  • Google Scholar: 12
  • OpenCitations: 6
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-24:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 29 (PlumX).
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Castelo Branco Flores, Camil) .

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Castelo Branco Flores, Camil.